Course Evaluation Items

There are no divisional items for graduate courses. The following items appear on all evaluations for undergraduate courses administered by the Course Evaluation System at the Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering.

1. The course helped me improve my ability to formulate, analyze and solve problems.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
2. The instructor related course concepts to practical applications and/or current research.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
3. Compared to other courses, the workload for this course was:
   Scale: Very Light, Light, Average, Heavy, Very Heavy
4. The instructor explained how the course concepts related to other courses.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
5. The feedback I received on tests, assignments, labs, and/or projects provided guidance on how to improve my understanding of course materials.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
6. The instructor explained what students are expected to learn in the course.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
7. The course instructor delivered the course material in a clear and organized manner.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

Departmental Level Items
ECE: Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering

1. Overall, the quality of my learning experience in the tutorial/lab was:
   Scale: Poor, Fair, Good, Very Good, Excellent

The following items appear on all evaluations for graduate and undergraduate courses administered by the Course Evaluation System at the Faculty of Arts & Science.

1. The instructor generated enthusiasm for learning in the course.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
2. Compared to other courses, the workload for this course was…
   Scale: Very Light, Light, Average, Heavy, Very Heavy
3. I would recommend this course to other students.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, Strongly

Department Level Items
The Faculty of Arts & Science has a number of departmental level items.

• Faculty of Arts & Science Unit Level Items (pdf)

IHPME Items

1. I found the course work load manageable.
2. The overall integration of in-class and out-of-class learning activities, assignments, and resources was:
3. When appropriate, assignments, discussions, or lectures, explored and handled topics related to bias, discrimination, equity, or social justice.
4. The feedback on course assignments was prompt.
5. The feedback on course assignments was useful.
6. Extent to which the course learning objectives/ competencies were achieved overall.
7. The course content was relevant for my personal career development.
8. The course explored speakers, scholars, discussions, and other opportunities to provide diverse perspectives to my learning.
9. The instructor created a safe and welcoming environment for all students.
10. The course provided opportunities for active learning (e.g. in-class discussions, group projects, case studies, problem solving, role plays/simulation, etc.)

PHS Items

1. The feedback on course assessments was prompt (I.e., giving me time to use it in the course).
2. The feedback on course assessments was useful (I.e., helped me to improve or achieve mastery).
3. The course instructor encouraged respect for different opinions and experiences in the classroom.
4. The course actively engaged me in the content (e.g. in-class discussions, group projects, case studies, problem solving, role plays/simulation, etc.).
5. The course explored issues of equity, discrimination and inclusion as appropriate for the subject area.
6. The course helped me improve my ability to understand, formulate, analyze, and solve problems from multiple perspectives.
7. The course content allowed me to develop/enhance skills that will be useful.
8. The course broadened or deepened my ability to communicate effectively.

The following items appear on all evaluations administered by the Course Evaluation System at the Faculty of Dentistry.

1. The course outline, including information about tests, assignments, or projects, was clear.
2. Online tools, used to support course activities, contributed to my learning of the course material.
3. The course highlighted the connections between theory, practice, and research.
4. The course provided opportunity to apply course material to current issues in the field.
   Scale for items 1-4: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
5. Compared to other courses, the workload for this course was…
   Scale: Very Light, Light, Average, Heavy, Very Heavy

The following items ask about the student experience with the course director.

1. The course director organized lectures in a logical manner.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
2. Please comment on the course director’s role in contributing to the quality of your learning experience in this course.
   Item is an open-ended, qualitative question.

The following items ask about the student experience with the course lecturer(s).

1. The lecturers used examples when explaining course concepts.
2. The lecturers encouraged students to draw knowledge from other courses to understand course material.
   Scale for items 1-2: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

No divisional items for undergraduate courses. The following items appear on all evaluations for graduate courses administered by the Course Evaluation System at the Faculty of Information.

1. The course instructor encouraged students to think about the subject matter from multiple perspectives.
2. The course instructor encouraged me to explore alternative approaches when problem-solving.
3. The course drew attention to ethical and social issues related to the field of study.
4. The course instructor encouraged students to reflect critically on the course material.
5. The course instructor explained how course topics contributed to an overall understanding of the field (i.e. Archives, Knowledge Management, Museum Studies).
   Scale for items 1-5: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

The following items appear on all evaluations for undergraduate courses administered by the Course Evaluation System at the Faculty of Kinesiology & Physical Education.

1. The instructor explained how the course concepts related to other courses.
2. Course assignment or project descriptions, including information about requirements, were clear.
3. The course instructor encouraged respect for different opinions and experiences in the classroom.
4. Course projects and/or assignments provided opportunity for creativity and creative thinking.
5. The course provided instruction on how to extract important information from texts, articles, or other sources.
6. The course provided instruction on how to conduct research on the subject matter.
7. The course provided opportunity to develop my research report writing skills.
8. The course expanded my understanding of professional practices in the field.
   Scale for items 1-8: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

The following items appear on all evaluations for undergraduate courses administered by the Course Evaluation System at the Faculty of Music.

1. Please comment on how this course has changed the way that you hear, think about, teach, perform, or compose music.
   Item 1 is an open-ended, qualitative question.
2. The course instructor encouraged students to draw from knowledge from other courses to understand the course material.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
3. The course instructor imparts an expectation of excellence while remaining sensitive to students’ circumstances and challenges.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
4. The course instructor demonstrated respect for diversity (e.g. race, gender, ability, religion, sexual orientation, etc) in the classroom.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
5. I would rate my level of commitment in this course as:
   Scale: Very Low, Low, Neutral, High, Very High

Department Level Items

• Faculty of Music – Unit Level Items.pdf
  

The following items appear on all evaluations for undergraduate courses administered by the Course Evaluation System at the Faculty of Nursing.

1. The course enhanced my understanding of professional nursing practice.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
2. The course highlighted connections between theory and/or research and nursing practice.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

The following items appear on all evaluations for graduate courses administered by the Course Evaluation System at the Faculty of Nursing.

1. This course helped me progress toward achievement of my educational goals.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
2. The course environment promoted a supportive community for learning.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

The following items appear on all evaluations for graduate courses administered by the Course Evaluation System at OISE.

1. The course instructor made it clear what students were expected to learn in the course.
2. The course instructor demonstrated respect for diversity in the classroom.
3. The course instructor encouraged students to express their own ideas in the class.
   Scale for items 1-3: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

The following items appear on all evaluations for undergraduate courses administered by the Course Evaluation System at the Faculty of Pharmacy.

1. The course enhanced my understanding of professional pharmacy practice.
2. The course helped me improve my ability to formulate, analyze, and solve problems.
3. The instructor related course concepts to practical applications and/or current research.
4. The instructor explained how the course concepts related to other courses.
5. The feedback I received on tests, assignments, labs and/or projects provided guidance to improve my understanding of course materials.
6. The instructor explained what students are expected to learn in the course.
7. The instructor responded respectfully to students’ questions.
   Scale for items 1-7: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

PharmD for Pharmacists Program – Specific Items

1. The course instructor maintained a presence throughout the course.
2. The instructor was available for contact if needed.
3. Online tools used in this course supported my learning.
   Scale for items 1-3: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

The following items appear on all evaluations for graduate courses administered by the Course Evaluation System at the Faculty of Pharmacy.

1. The course provided opportunity to draw from scholarly research.
2. The course provided opportunity to critically evaluate ideas.
3. The course helped in the development of skill and/or knowledge for my research.
4. The course encouraged me to think about the subject matter outside of class.
5. The course environment provided a supportive community for learning.
6. Throughout the semester, the instructor explained what the students are expected to learn in the course.
   Scale for items 1-6: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
7. What could be done to improve the course, if anything?
   This is an open-ended, qualitative question.

The following items appear on all evaluations administered by the Course Evaluation System for the Rotman School of Management.

1. The instructor created an inclusive and respectful environment.
2. I received feedback on deliverables that contributed to my learning of the course material.
3. The course materials (e.g., textbook, readings, slides, cases, speakers, etc.) supported my learning in this course.
4. The course provided opportunities for me to use and develop my communication skills.
   Scale for items 1-4: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
5. The workload was appropriate relative to learning.
   Scale: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neither Disagree or Agree, Agree, Strongly Agree
   
6. I would recommend this course to other students.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, Strongly
7. What did the instructor do that was particularly effective in helping you learn?
8. Is there anything else the instructor could have done to help you learn?

Departmental Level Items
Scale for all items: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

Full-Time MBA

1. The course provided me with knowledge that I can use for my career.
2. The course provided me with collaborative learning opportunities with my peers.

Morning/Evening MBA

1. The course has been useful in my current professional role.
2. The course provided me with knowledge that I can use for my career.

Executive MBA

1. The course has been useful in my current professional role.
2. The course improved my leadership knowledge base.

GEMBA-HLS

1. The course has been useful in my current professional role.
2. The course provided me with knowledge that I can use for my career.

MFin

1. The course provided me with knowledge that I can use for my career.

MMA

1. This course expanded my knowledge of technical skills in analytics and data science.
2. This course expanded my knowledge of managerial applications of analytics and data science, and when and how to use them.

MFRM

1. The course provided me with knowledge that I can use for my career.

GDipPA

1. The course helped me prepare for The Common Final Examination (CFE).
2. The course has improved my integrated thinking and case writing skills.

The following items appear on all evaluations administered by the Course Evaluation System, excluding courses with an AGE course code.

1. The course expanded my understanding of the profession of Social Work.
2. The course provided opportunity to consider multiple sources of information in my professional decision-making.
3. The course instructor encouraged respect for different opinions and experiences in the classroom.
4. The course content was relevant to my professional development.
5. The course instructor’s feedback on course assignments, projects, tests, and/or papers contributed to my learning of the course material.
   Scale for items 1-5: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

The following items appear on all evaluations administered by the Course Evaluation System for courses with an AGE course code.

1. The course provided information on important issues in the subject matter.
2. The course instructor encouraged students to think about the subject matter from multiple perspectives.
3. The course instructor encouraged respect for different opinions and experiences in the classroom.
4. The course instructor related course concepts to current issues or real-life situations.
5. The course instructor’s feedback on course assignments, projects, tests, and/or papers contributed to my learning.
   Scale for items 1-5: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

The following items appear on all undergraduate evaluations administered by the Course Evaluation System at the University of Toronto Mississauga.

1. Compared to other courses, the workload for this course was…
   Scale: Very Light, Light, Average, Heavy, Very Heavy
2. I would recommend this course to other students.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, Strongly
3. The course inspired me to learn more about the subject matter.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

The following items appear on all graduate evaluations administered by the Course Evaluation System at the University of Toronto Mississauga.

1. The course provided opportunity for me to enhance my critical thinking and judgement.
2. The course content was relevant to my professional development.
3. The course instructor related course concepts to current issues or real-life situations
   Scale for items 1-3: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal

Departmental Level Items

• List of Departmental Level items for University of Toronto Mississauga (pdf)

The following items appear on all evaluations administered by the Course Evaluation System at the University of Toronto Scarborough (both graduate and undergraduate programs).

1. The course inspired me to think further about the subject matter outside of class.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, A Great Deal
2. Compared to other courses, the workload for this course was:
   Scale: Very Light, Light, Average, Heavy, Very Heavy
3. I would recommend this course to other students.
   Scale: Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Mostly, Strongly

Departmental Level Items

• List of Departmental Level Items for University of Toronto Scarborough (PDF)